Mirrors/lodash
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/whoisclebs/lodash.git synced 2026-02-10 10:57:49 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Fixes #538 -- confusing wording around chaining.

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Jeremy Ashkenas
2012-04-02 13:05:52 -04:00
parent 34305bc85d
commit db7d198a55
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
index.html
View File

@@ -1382,8 +1382,7 @@ _.map([1, 2, 3], function(n){ return n * 2; });
_([1, 2, 3]).map(function(n){ return n * 2; });</pre> _([1, 2, 3]).map(function(n){ return n * 2; });</pre>
<p> <p>
Using the object-oriented style allows you to chain together methods. Calling Calling <tt>chain</tt> on a wrapped object will cause all future method calls to
<tt>chain</tt> on a wrapped object will cause all future method calls to
return wrapped objects as well. When you've finished the computation, return wrapped objects as well. When you've finished the computation,
use <tt>value</tt> to retrieve the final value. Here's an example of chaining use <tt>value</tt> to retrieve the final value. Here's an example of chaining
together a <b>map/flatten/reduce</b>, in order to get the word count of together a <b>map/flatten/reduce</b>, in order to get the word count of
@@ -1534,7 +1533,8 @@ _([1, 2, 3]).value();
<b class="header">1.2.4</b> &mdash; <small><i>Jan. 4, 2012</i></small><br /> <b class="header">1.2.4</b> &mdash; <small><i>Jan. 4, 2012</i></small><br />
<ul> <ul>
<li> <li>
You now can (and probably should) write <tt>_.chain(list)</tt> You now can (and probably should, as it's simpler)
write <tt>_.chain(list)</tt>
instead of <tt>_(list).chain()</tt>. instead of <tt>_(list).chain()</tt>.
</li> </li>
<li> <li>